The government has proposed relief measures four times in the past six months, but the objective effects and public response prove that the rescue measures have not been put in place. The SAR Government must consider the core of the problem. Otherwise, it will not help Hong Kong get out of the siege.|
Everyone knows ten Hong Kong people. Hong Kong's economic depression lies in black riot ports. Stopping riots and bringing Hong Kong's economy back on track really depends on the concerted efforts of the public, because if the social atmosphere is still violent, or even if the public supports the violence with financial resources or actions, society will only become more and more hurt and inevitably hate mistakes. However, even though the responsibility for the economic depression must lie with thugs, insurgents, and behind-the-scenes, the greatest thrust to stop the violence must lie with the government. Undoubtedly, the government still feels "appeasing policy" for many months. Although the 30,000 policemen have been exhausted, they have only introduced anti-masking law and introduced a small number of special task police, but they have not mobilized the entire civil service team from beginning to end. There is also no way to create a safe voice for peaceful and rational citizens. At present, the evil forces of thugs have matured. The SAR government still adopts a "no war, no defense" attitude. What is the basis for restoring the economy? The author is most afraid that the government is paralyzed by the current black storm, which has failed to provide the right remedy. However, it turns out that Hong Kong society has long since returned to a dead end.
Secondly, the bailout measures are not left unattended. The question is whether the bailout measures are in place. Otherwise, the government will be blamed for wasting public money. In the past, the government's rescue measures were complicated, and some measures set a threshold of only 75% after the cap was set. In the end, it was only a few thousand yuan, which could not save businesses, but also provoked the public to wonder why the government loves to use such a complicated process. In the calculation, it will repeat the mistake of the 4,000 yuan plan. The public perception is that they would rather spend one yuan to monitor the citizens than to spend one yuan on the citizens. At the same time, some refund measures have also attracted criticism. The government does not adopt a direct reduction or exemption for the next year. Instead, it chooses to refund the recycling fee to the public. However, the refund fee must be filled out and collected in person, which may only cost hundreds of yuan. Amount. The measures mentioned above are just the tip of the iceberg. The writer certainly understands that the government has government procedures, and that the relief measures are urgent. It is inevitable that there are flaws, but the government must reflect and learn to facilitate the people. Some people's grievances may be sent out. It is necessary to dismantle the walls and loosen them to facilitate the citizens, so that the relief measures can have their effect