律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-18 14:34

温哥华失踪致死的漂亮妈妈真的是忧郁自杀吗?(转)

-by justiceQC/律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese),《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺! a voice for little people, ordinary people and minority people in Quebec, Canada!

家园网的热帖《这女士是谁杀的?孩子才2个月就没有娘了!》:帖子链接

反复看了太太失踪前的两段检控录像 (CTV新闻),有几点想说:

1. 孩子父亲在采访时反复说妻子的产后忧郁症症状,似乎把给自己脱罪放到为媒体提供寻找妻子线索的优先级之上;
2. 失踪当天的晚上,丈夫在做什么?没有找太太,没有报警?
3. 10月底,孩子妈妈出门就已经穿薄羽绒服,而家属在事后接受采访时顶多穿雨衣,所以孩子妈妈是很怕冷、也很注意保暖的,最后尸体却是在冰冷的水里被捞上来的,怎么解释?
4. 30多岁的小夫妻,第一次做父亲,遇到这样的事这么冷静的,不多,眼睛几乎没有直视过摄像镜头......
5. 接受采访的家属,似乎都是男方的家属,男方的妹妹等...
6. 最让人费解的是,出事一段时间后,媒体突然改变口风,说失踪者可能就在多伦多,这个丈夫还在媒体“深情”对妻子喊话;现在回过头来看失踪的两段录像:1)妻子出走时手中似乎只有一部手机,最后在便利店付款据说也是现金,做丈夫的居然不能判断妻子是否有可能出远门?而且是在出事一段时间后突然“引导”媒体认为妻子有可能只是逃避?2)从录像中妻子出门,到她最后出现在便利店中间有9个小时,就算她有忧郁倾向的话,至少说明她还在纠结,看不出放弃生命的迹象,最后到便利店也是买饮料和香蕉,这是有求死欲望的人会做的事情吗?!7. 关键问题:妻子出门后,丈夫有没有和她有过任何联系?!不要忘了所有关于失踪/被谋杀妻子的“忧郁症”新闻报道几乎都来自于那位丈夫及男方家属,如果说常人很难理解产后忧郁症患者心态,问题是上面列举的男方行为举止为什么也“很难用正常人思维理解”?从新闻报道看,男方家境不俗,在这件事情上,有团队操作:建facebook网页、开twitter讨论话题,开烛光晚会,采访产后忧郁症专家......局做得好,就是把旁观者带入他所设定的自杀推断。当代海外华人以经过筛选的人群为主,犯案凶嫌,也早就摆脱了既定的模式。道貌岸然背后的人性泯灭实例,见得还少么?8.另外,新闻报道说:“据了解,失踪前不久,梁开始服抗抑郁药物,但在10月25日离开住所时,她并没有带上所服的抗抑郁药物。” “失踪”前不久,才开始服抗抑郁药物,并没有采访家庭医生的新闻,而是采访一般产后抑郁专家。坚持母乳喂养,说明孩子的妈妈很在乎孩子的健康,怎么会答应在哺乳期间服抗抑郁药物?是被谁极力说服的吗?是为了现在拿来用作证据吗?!
太太早晨9点离家出走,下午6点还在便利店买食物,她真的想死吗?从太太出走,到第二天早晨再公园发现被遗弃的车,丈夫在做什么?没有找妻子? 没有报警?新闻也没有这段时间家属在做什么的报道?!再有,自杀的人不会留有字条吗? 没有任何来自死者自己的自杀解释,完全是活着的人强加式的说辞,媒体、警方凭什么对丈夫的一面之词全数买单?!在加拿大,果然 Chinese lives do NOT matter!
如果一个丈夫很清楚产后忧郁症可能导致轻生是社会常识,与妻子的矛盾早已到了心生杀机的程度,看到太太的轻度忧郁症倾向,大概会顺水推舟、诱导其走向死亡、甚至不惜亲自动手,再制造各种假象做局,这种可能性如果成立的话,作案丈夫在事发后的态度一定是超级冷静,诡异。别忘了,在加拿大刑法里,即便是criminal negligence causing deach也是罪;如果有killing动机的话,那就是murder!

为失踪太太办烛光晚会的“焦虑”丈夫,这微表情,谁来解读一下?
http://bc.ctvnews.ca/keep-missing-mother-in-your-thoughts-worried-husband-pleads-1.3151854http://68.media.tumblr.com/6461107a41349de7bba35e361376fb77/tumblr_inline_ogtcxgHk9Q1tdof7x_1280.png
看了本网的新闻报道,女方父亲表示是晚上收到消息的,而警察其实在早晨就通知了死者丈夫;女方父母对女儿出事态度迥异:父亲:痛心,难以接受;母亲:和男方异口同声地渲染女儿的忧郁症;要知道男方家境可是不俗,这样的家庭,想做什么,既容易,也不容易,看对什么人......


律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-18 17:41

还记得陈慧案中,她的男友怎么说的吗? Winnipeg已经有copycat案件出炉了!一模一样的说辞: “据Maggie Liu的丈夫Podge Dimagiba说,失踪那天晚上他们本来一起就寝,但醒来时不见妻子。她显然是离家出走了,连钱包和信用卡都没有带。”
“忧郁症自杀”是加拿大警方和媒体对所有华人离奇失踪案的结论模板吗?!



新闻


律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-18 19:51

一直以来(今年尤其多)海外华人、尤其是加拿大华人的离奇失踪案都是悲剧结果,除了澳大利亚冷梦梅案、多伦多李迎春案凶嫌归案,其他的大概都是死不瞑目的冤案:崔晓明、李建萍母子、陈慧、Florence Leung!更有甚者,Winnipeg已经出了COPYCAT案例,为什么?就是因为这些案件大都不了了之,以后只怕会愈演愈烈!

没有死者只言片语,单凭案件利害相关人强加的一面之词,警方凭什么以“抑郁自杀”结案?!

律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-19 00:13

看看其他媒体是怎么报道抑郁自杀案的,需要什么样的关键证据。而且,人家依然没有草率定案下结论:

据东森新闻云报道,美国女星丽莎马斯特斯(Lisa Masters)曾演出知名剧集《花边教主》、《丑女贝蒂》等,但近年来饱受忧郁症的困扰,没想到传来不幸的消息,当她为了一场走秀前往南美秘鲁时,竟被发现陈尸在下榻饭店的衣橱内,在她身边发现字条及抗抑郁的药物,被推断是在衣柜上吊自杀,详细情况仍在调查中。

据《US WEEKLY》报道,丽莎远赴祕鲁是为了模特儿走秀工作,却在15日被发现陈尸在下榻饭店的衣柜,目前经纪人已经证实这个不幸的消息,但为了保护死者,并未对外透露太多讯息;当地警方透露,她生前留下2封信,内容描述自己的精神状况,再加上现场的药物,推断可能是因为不堪抑郁症困扰而自杀,详细情况尚待进一步确认。
http://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2016/11/18/5785070.html

律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-19 22:16

有人说,抑郁症的可能性大。有道理,不过,顺势诱导受害者的病情,甚至谋害其性命的话,司法理应介入。却由于布局者心机重重、华人没有话语权、警察的草菅人命,使得刑法的“无罪推断”和“beyond reasonable doubt”举证责任成为加拿大华人失踪命案的破案瓶颈,徒增狼子野心之徒恶胆,导致此类案件接连发生、案情高度相似。冤魂不散,早晚会形成社会症结,加拿大政府如果不及早醒悟的话,Brexit和Trump's Victory就是例子!

-justiceQC/律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese),《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺! a voice for little people, ordinary people and minority people in Quebec, Canada!

律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-20 03:29

如果您也认同华人的失踪冤案有频繁加重的趋势,如果您认同本文的观点,请用力分享,发出“华人生命同等重要”的呐喊!深谢!
We, Chinese Community in Canada, Say No!

In many Canadian-Chinese Online social medias, people are being astonished by a series of tragic missing cases: Florence Leung, Lucy Hui Chen, Xiao Ming Cui, Jian Ping Li and her son, and now we heard that Maggie Liu has been missing since October 30, 2016.

Not only do we know much about how suspicious the stories are, but what even more remarkable is the self-contradictory testimonies given by some of the family members or so-called friends seemed so easily blinded the police to close the cases with the conclusion of the victims’ so-called “post-partum depression”, regardless those survived people’s strange and illogic behaviours.

From the press, we know that Maggie Liu’s husband gave the almost same testimony as Lucy Hui Chen’s boyfriend gave: the victim “disappeared in the night after they went to sleep and left behind her wallet and credit cards”. The very same person also described Maggie Liu’s wearing as “a gray jacket, dark-coloured pants and dark shoes”. Nevertheless, the contradictory testimonies seemed to be overlooked.

Speak of Florence Leung Case, without a single word left by the victim, but with a post-partum depression picture painted by the husband who could not have figured out whether his wife was able to travel to Toronto, pleaded publicly with his wife, pretending she were hiding in Toronto, the police said “foul play is not suspected”, despite the fact that the victim was still looking for food 9 hours after she left home which means she did not give up her life; despite the fact that the victim kept herself warm with a winter jacket, turns out, her body was found in cold water. The press or the police could not be bothered to question whether the husband concerned himself with his wife’s safety during the first 9 hours; they overlooked the fact that most of the remark given by the husband was about how depress his wife was, not focused on how can we find her; they overlooked the small smile came over the husband’s face during the gathering he held for his wife and yet, they concluded “foul play is not suspected”!

Maggie Liu’s missing seems a copycat case inspired by Lucy Hui Chen’s case. Given the place where Lucy Hui Chen’s body was found, the police was clearly being misled by somebody. Did they re-investigate the case? I doubt. And here we are, having another missing case with almost the same scenario! Why not? A happy ending for a murderer can always inspire many other devils who received a clear message from the police: Chinese lives do not matter; post-partum depression can apply to all the missing cases in Chinese community because they cannot express themselves in our language, they care nothing other than working hard for a better life!

NO! Brexit and Trump’s victory wake up the little people, ordinary people and minority people in the world, including us, Chinese communities across Canada.

Here is our message: We, Chinese people, the most law-abiding community in Canada, have been silent all the time when all kinds of injustice fall on us as if this is as it should be, but we will not take it anymore, because of Brexit, because of Trump’s victory, because we share the same value as you do: LIVES MATTER! SO DO WE CHINESE LIVES!

-justiceQC/律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese), the first one who translated Quebec Business Corporations Act (2011) into Chinese, a voice for little people, ordinary people and minority people in Quebec, Canada!

http://yes-justice-seeking.tumblr.com/

律政江湖 发表于 2016-11-22 10:04

(转)
什么是criminal negligence? 法官对刑事疏忽造成伤害的量刑可以达到10年监禁;如果造成死亡,可能被判终生监禁。(A person found guilty of criminal negligence causing injuries can be given up to 10 years in prison. If the negligence caused death, the maximum penalty is life in prison. )

那么法官要从那几点判断是否构成刑事疏忽criminal negligence?
1 法律要求做、或不做某件事情,而被告没有按照执行;
The person accused of criminal negligence did something or failed to do something he or she was required by law to do.
2 被告的行为/不作为显示出对他人生命、或安全极大的、有危险的漠视;
The actions of the accused showed an extreme or dangerous disregard for the lives or safety of other people..
3 被告的这种行为/不作为造成了伤害或死亡
The actions or inaction caused injuries or death
ref.: https://www.educaloi.qc.ca/en/ne ... -negligence-defined

以本案中丈夫一再强调妻子已经出现了抑郁症倾向来看,自家有监控看到妻子早晨9点就离家出走(未锁门),到晚上6点没有回家(此时市区便利店录像显示受害人还活着,买食物),丈夫如果没有发起有效的寻找的话,such failure constitutes actionable negligence.不服来辩。

-justiceQC/律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese),《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺! a voice for little people, ordinary people and minority people in Quebec, Canada!
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 温哥华失踪致死的漂亮妈妈真的是忧郁自杀吗?(转)